From the
time I was transferred north from the LA area, except for the initial
training period in San Francisco, I was engaged in chemical
engineering research. This was true as long as I was nominally
attached to the SF office, even though I was spending time either at
the experimental tray test column at Emeryville or at the laboratory
in south Berkeley.
At SF
there wasn’t a chemical engineering department as such — it
wasn’t until the transfer to Emeryville was made that this was
formalized. However both at SF and Emeryville this research was under
the direction of Matt Saunders, who was one of the more notable
individuals I knew at Shell, or for that matter in the field of
chemical engineering. He was a paraplegic, having been injured by a
shotgun blast to his lower spinal area as a young person, probably in
his early teens.
Despite
this handicap of spending the rest of his days in a wheelchair, he
entered the engineering field and his doctoral work was the
pioneering work in the development of a truly scientific basis for
assessing the capacity of distillation equipment. He had first worked
for Shell at Wilmington where I started but he had transferred to SF
by the time I arrived on the scene.
He was a
man of rather slight statute, I’d guess he never weighed more than
100 pounds. Personality-wise he was a very considerate, even kindly
person, and I was fortunate in having him over me in management.
Between him (as department head in chemical engineering) and me there
was Robert Olney as supervisor. Olney was actually also a graduate of
Iowa and he was in the master’s degree program there during my
senior year.
A
preponderant part of the chemical engineering research I was
associated with related to the design of distillation equipment (from
the standpoint of capacity or throughput, associated characteristics
such as pressure drop, and tray efficiency — thus it was different
from “paper” research on computer programs for theoretical tray
calculations) but it also included the design of extraction equipment
and liquid/solid contacting.
The
work, particularly that in the field of distillation equipment, led,
perhaps inevitably, to my becoming an expert in the field. As a
result I formulated, in conjunction with others, the design manuals
for various types of distillation equipment and for extraction
equipment that were used in Shell USA. During this period Shell also
belonged to an inter-industry research group called Fractionation Research Inc.
which was on the premises of the C.F. Braun company (one of the
premier chemical construction firms at the time — thought it lost
its position in subsequent years). This group had meetings several
times a year to discuss its program and results and over the years I
attended a good fraction of them — they were held in various places
in the Midwest and wester USA such as LA, Dallas, Tulsa, Houston,
etc.).
The
research at Emeryville was coordinated with work at Shell Oil’s
Houston refinery and this results in trips to Houston and New York in
relation the work at the different locations. The trip to Holland
thatI made in 1954 was also in the area of relating the experimental
work which was being done at Emeryville with the work being done at
the Delft laboratory (near the Hague) by the Dutch part of Royal
Dutch/Shell.
This trip which lasted about 2-1/2 months came at a
less-than-propitious time for Jean and me. Jean was pregnant with
Muriel, indeed in the last trimester, and Shell felt that it would be
unwise for her to accompany me on the trip. Had it not been for this
she would likely have come along, and I daresay the time in Holland
would have been extended. Actually in retrospect I think that she
could well have made the trip even though she was pregnant and Muriel
might have been born in Holland rather than at Alta Bates in
Berkeley.
No comments:
Post a Comment