During
the time from late 1946 until 1953 when I married Jean, I attended
rather irregularly the Bethany Lutheran Church in Berkeley. When I
left southern California I had transferred my church membership back
to the church in Gowrie but I later transferred it to Bethany. I also
participated in the young persons group though also somewhat
irregularly. It was when I was at an evening meeting of the group at
the church that my car was the victim of the hit/run accident. During
this period my attitude toward Christianity and the Lutheran church
was sort of hit or miss, up and down but one way or another I
generally didn’t consider it too seriously until there was a
conflict between Jean and me between Christian Science and the more
conventional churches.
In
retrospect I think the conflict served to weaken further my already
declining regard for conventional Christianity, and for church
personnel. This would apply both to such groups as Christian Science
but even more so eventually to the older parts of the Christian
establishment.
After
our marriage Jean and I sort of went our separate ways as far as
church was concerned until after Muriel was old enough to start
Sunday School. In the interest of some kind of family commitment in
common for her background Jean and I agreed to start attending the
Methodist church in north Berkeley. As I recall we looked at various
churches, including Presbyterian, Unitarian as well as other but
finally settled on Epworth. I transferred my membership from Bethany
but Jean has never joined after letting her membership as a Christian
Scientist lapse. In a way I suppose she had a stronger allegiance to
Christian Science than I had to any organized religion, so she made a
more significant adjustment than I did.
Actually,
Jean’s family on her mother’s side had a historical connection to
the Methodist church, some of them being as I recall founding members
of one of the churches there. One of the reasons for selecting
Epworth was the minister then in charge there. His name was Paul
Getty and he was a philosopher as well as a minister. Unfortunately
he left after a couple of years later at the conclusion of a building
program.
Amongst
his successors was Max Brown, who though not a philosopher, was an
individual I recall with real affection. He was a most warm and
likable individual and his sermons were such that I would listen to
them — something I seldom do any more. There was another feature of
Epworth that was highly in its favor. Located as it was in north
Berkeley, it had as members several of the faculty of the Pacific
School of Religion. they were certainly a leavening influence on the
quality of the religious scene at Epworth and of the classes which
were held on Sunday mornings.
The
association that Jean and I had with Epworth and later on in Houston
at Memorial Drive Methodist Church, delayed I think my retreat from
involvement with religion and the church. I’m quite sure that had
it not have been for this compromise in the interest of our daughters
that my status now would be much less than it actually is — rather
low though it may be. Currently we attend the Methodist church here
once a month on the day I act as an usher. That attendance, plus the
contribution we make, and the occasional attendance at some other
event is about the sum of activity for me.
When we
first arrived in Ashland we used the church as a basis for
establishing various social contacts and we were quite active in
attendance and in participation in such groups as the “Merry-mates”
— a dinner group for married couple. This participation has
gradually declined, partly as a result of a pastor who came to serve
the congregation whose ritualistic tendency and lack of interesting
discourse was not to the liking of either Jean or me.
Jean has
continued her participation in such “old ladies” groups as UMW —
I guess partly because of her liking for such persons. For awhile I
attended the monthly suppers of the men’s group but haven’t now
for several years. Several factor caused this decision. First I was
“hooked” into being a caller to find out who was going to attend
the meetings and I resented being asked to do something that I was
not interested in doing. Further I have gradually become averse to
after-dark activities, particularly in the winter months, preferring
instead a quiet evening of reading or watching TV at home. But what
really caused my decline of interest was the gradual feeling of lack
of stimulation from the persons attending, despite their general
friendliness and the usually tasty quality of the church-cooked
suppers. During the time we have lived here in Ashland, only Laurel
has spent much time actually living here and her lack of interest in
any church activities probably contributed to our diminution of
interest in the church.
In later
life it is only Laurel, however, who has shown much inclination to
establish an attendance relationship with a church. We have actually
attended, with her, Mike and Lillian, the church in Seattle that she
had chosen. It was the Easter service and we also participated in the
Easter breakfast.
Palma
and Dave have mentioned the possibility of some affiliation with such
a group as the Unitarian church, but nothing has come of it and the
arrival of our grandson may have delayed any plan they may have
considered. Muriel has no contacts generally, though over the year
she has gone back occasionally to either Epworth or the Christian Science church in Berkeley.
We have
visited Epworth a few times over the years — its tenor is quite
different now ans I suspect that we would not fit in as well as we did
in the ’50s and ’60s. It seems to be still a well-functioning
organization. I think this is partly because of its location with is
well away from downtown Berkeley. The Christian Science church which Jean attended for many years has been less fortunate. It’s in an
area that no longer provides the potential membership it once had.
Either there has been a move to the suburbs of its previous members
and this has caused a decline in its membership or the character of
the Berkeley population has changed. It still functions but what the
future holds for it remains to be seen The structure is an
architectural gem and it is sad to see its deterioration. Recently
(about 2004) Jean was contacted by a group that was trying to get
funds to fix up the structure and I believe that Jean made a
contribution.